Personal security and the Manus detention case

-
Human development is a concept that is at the heart of human security. The website Measure of America defines the concept as:
"the process of enlarging people’s freedoms and opportunities and improving their well-being. Human development is about the real freedom ordinary people have to decide who to be, what to do, and how to live."
You can also listen to the podcast below by Selim Jahan of the Human Development Report Office on the concept of human development.

The UNDP states that:
"Human development – or the human development approach - is about expanding the richness of human life, rather than simply the richness of the economy in which human beings live. It is an approach that is focused on people and their opportunities and choices."
The Measure of America website states that the human development concept was developed by economist Mahbub ul Haq. He argued that existing measure of human progress failed to account for the true purpose of development - to improve people's lives. He focused on the failure of Gross Domestic Product as a measure of well-being.

It is a shift from looking at development from an economic point of view to a human point of view. This is expressed in the UNDP definition where:
"human development focuses on improving the lives people lead rather than assuming that economic growth will lead, automatically, to greater wellbeing for all. Income growth is seen as a means to development, rather than an end in itself."
In our required reading by Hampson (2008), he makes the connection between human development and human security.  He said human security is the study of the ways that the forces of globalization have damage the prospects for human development and the provision of basic human needs.

If you look at our offshore detention case, the relocation of the asylum seekers to Manus Island is possible due to the improvements in transportation. Also, according to Globalization 101, it is the result of the process of interaction and integration among the governments of Australia and PNG.

The border security breaches by people smugglers from Indonesia ferrying those seeking asylum in Australia is a transnational issue. Thus, the Australian government needs a strategy to deter people seeking asylum from coming to Australia resulting in the offshore detention centre on Manus Island.

Now the concern is for the personal security of those living in the detention or transition centre on Manus Island. Personal security is defined by UNDP in the Human Develop Report of 1994 as security from physical violence. Regardless of where you live your life is increasingly threatened by sudden, unpredictable violence.

The Report states that the threats take several forms:
  • Threats from the state (physical torture)
  • Threats from other states (war)
  • Threats from other groups of people (ethnic tension)
  • Threats from individual or gangs against other individuals or or gangs (crime, street violence)
  • Threats directed against women (rape, domestic violence)
  • Threat directed at Children based on their vulnerability and dependence (child abuse)
  • Threats to self (suicide, drug use).
I would like to stress on the final point on threats to self in relations to our case. Let us go back to the video and to the part where an employee of the center was interviewed by the reporter. He talked about cases of suicide in the detention centre.

Apart from the video, we have a report on The New York Times written by Sarah Malik on the body of an asylum seeker who hanged himself near the transit centre on Manus Island. The asylum seeker from Iran was said to have been suffering depressive episodes. The report was written on August 7, 2017.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported on 2 October 2017 that an asylum seeker from Sri Lanka died on Manus Island. I noticed the word 'suicide' in the statement given by the Provincial Police Commander of Manus.  

The Guardian has an interesting twist. Friends of the asylum seeker who died begged Australia for help before his death. He was suffering from acute mental health crisis for more than a year and attempted to commit suicide before eventually taking his own life.

Back in 2016, Ben Doherty from The Guardian reported that he was found;
"naked in the Mike compound, yelling in an incoherent and distressed state, and was arrested and taken to Lorengau prison, before being taken to the "managed accommodation area" within the detention centre for people suffering mental heath problems" 
What happened to Hamed Shamshiripour is a case of personal security. The security professionals and other government officers from Australia and PNG were not able to prevent him from taking his own life. He himself was not in the right state of mind to avoid taking his life.

On the other hand, the Sri Lankan Tamil man who killed himself was alleged to have committed another offense related to personal security. According to a report by Eric Tlozek, he was charged with sexually assaulting a local women in January, 2017.

The victim's family was shocked after hearing what the 31 year old did. The audio report talked about how the woman met the man at the market and followed him to a nearby hotel where she was sexually assaulted.

Therefore, the personal security of the asylum seekers is an issue that both governments need to address. But also we have to think about the personal security of the Manus people in light of what happened to the 19 year old woman.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Rise and fall realism

-
Image
By Colin Elman and Michael A. Jensen Source: Williams, P. D. (Ed.). (2008). Security studies: an introduction . London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. What is rise and fall realism? Rise and fall realism remerge as a powerful alternative to the balance of power theories that predominated international relations scholarship during the 1950’s. Central theme Hegemony is the foundation for peace while balance is often associated with war (Organski). Dynamics Rise and fall realism emphasizes that war between major powers is least likely when the international system is dominated by a single state and when there are no rising challengers vying for system leadership. Given its privileged position, a dominant state is capable of shaping the rules and practices of the international system in such a way as to satisfy its selfish interest. Stability is a product of this hegemonic order, as states which are dissatisfied with the status quo lack the capabilities to change it.
Read more