The Yegiora Files

By Bernard Yegiora In this week’s seminar , the central objective was not to tell students what to think about China’s growing presence in PNG and the Pacific. The objective was to expose them to competing scholarly perspectives and require them to form their own informed judgement. Seminar reflection: Is China a security threat or a development partner for PNG? Engaging the literature, examining competing views, and developing independent analysis. The discussion began with Matbob’s analysis of tensions between local communities and Chinese traders in PNG. These tensions highlight how economic competition, weak regulatory enforcement, and uneven development outcomes can produce social friction. Students were asked to consider whether such localised grievances constitute evidence of a broader security threat — or whether they reflect governance challenges within PNG itself. We then examined PNG’s balancing strategy. As argued in my own work , PNG engages China economically while main...

By Bernard Yegiora  Security in PNG is increasingly being understood through new analytical lenses shaped by local scholarship. In Week 3 of PG420 International and Regional Security, students engaged with this shift by examining two core works: my analysis of Blue Securit y and Francis Hualupmomi’s systems-based interpretation of PNG’s national security governance. ▶️ Watch the seminar discussion here: https://youtu.be/WxIf7jEHfsE The objective was not simply to review readings. It was to use these scholarly contributions to unpack security as a concept in International Relations and situate it within PNG’s strategic realities. My work on Blue Security begins from a structural reality: PNG is an archipelagic state whose security environment is shaped by the maritime domain. The study reframes national security priorities around the protection of the Exclusive Economic Zone, maritime law enforcement, surveillance capacity, and regional cooperation. It demonstrates how threats ...

By Bernard Yegiora Security remains one of the most powerful and contested ideas in international relations. It shapes budgets, institutions, political priorities, and ultimately determines who receives protection and who does not. Yet despite its centrality, the meaning of security is neither fixed nor universally agreed upon. In a recent seminar presentation, my students examined how the concept of security has evolved beyond its traditional military focus. Drawing on Paul Williams’ Security Studies: An Introduction and the broader framework associated with Barry Buzan, the discussion explored how security now extends into political, economic, societal, and environmental domains. This expansion has significantly reshaped both scholarship and policy practice. Seminar 1: Reframing Security in International Relations — examining how the concept of security has evolved from traditional military concerns to include human, economic, societal, and environmental dimensions. For much of the...

By Bernard Yegiora Key takeaways • Internet infrastructure is now a strategic national asset, not just a technical service. • PNG must avoid binary alignment in digital infrastructure decisions involving China and Australia. • A multi-partner, institution-led approach is essential to protect sovereignty, security, and development outcomes. Introduction: internet infrastructure is now strategic For PNG, the internet is no longer simply a tool for communication. It is part of national infrastructure tied to economic development, state capacity, service delivery, and security. Decisions about who builds, finances, or supports digital systems are therefore strategic choices. As geopolitical competition intensifies in the Indo-Pacific, digital infrastructure has become a key arena of influence. PNG finds itself navigating between major partners, particularly China and Australia, both of whom see telecommunications as central to regional stability and national security. This is not a si...

 By Bernard Yegiora  PNG’s new foreign policy white paper will set direction for the country’s diplomatic engagement in the coming years. The central challenge is not policy formulation. It is implementation. In the current environment, implementation will depend heavily on whether the state can coordinate its digital diplomatic platforms into a single operational system. At present, the digital footprint of PNG’s diplomacy is fragmented. Individual missions operate Facebook pages. The central presence of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) exists. The official website exists. But these platforms do not function as an integrated communications architecture. PNG’s diplomatic presence abroad is active and visible on social media, as seen on the official Facebook page of the PNG High Commission in Canberra. However, without direct integration with the DFA website and central platforms, these mission-level digital efforts remain isolated rather than operating as part of a c...

By Bernard Yegiora Key takeaways • PNG has policy and advisory functions, but lacks a dedicated, institutionalised foreign policy analysis system. • Inconsistent analytical processes increase volatility and weaken coherence for a small state. • A modest, permanent analysis unit would strengthen decision-making without undermining political authority. Screenshot from a news report announcing PNG’s adoption of a new Foreign Policy White Paper in November 2025, marking the first comprehensive update to the country’s foreign policy framework in over 40 years. Introduction: the issue is not engagement, but process PNG is not disengaged from the world. It maintains diplomatic relations across regions, participates in multilateral forums, and increasingly debates foreign policy decisions in public and parliamentary spaces. This visibility is healthy. However, visibility alone does not guarantee coherence. What matters is how foreign policy decisions are made , not only how they are anno...