Posts

Making Sense of the Numbers: My Top 3 Quantitative Data Analysis Techniques

Image
As part of my PhD research on how China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) influence PNG’s bilateral relations with China, I’ve spent the last few months collecting survey data from students, alumni, and public servants who participated in various HEEPs. These include the Chinese Government Scholarship Program (CGSP), Chinese Language Programs (CLPs), Public Sector Training Programs (PSTPs), PNG’s STEM scholarships, district-sponsored students, and privately funded learners. Now, with survey responses coming in from across the country and abroad, the focus shifts to analyzing the data. There are several statistical tools available for analyzing survey data, but not every technique is suited to every research project. Because my study uses an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design , the quantitative phase is not an end in itself—it informs the qualitative phase that follows. My goal is to choose analytical techniques that allow me to describe trends, compare experiences ...

Extending the Deadline: A Final Push to Reach My Minimum Survey Targets

Image
One of the most important aspects of data collection in a PhD research project is knowing when to pause, reflect, and adapt. For the past few months, I’ve been collecting responses for my survey exploring the influence of China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) on Papua New Guinea–China relations. The survey has been a key part of the quantitative phase of my explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, and I initially planned to close it on July 2, 2025 . However, after reviewing current response rates, I have decided to extend the closing date to July 9, 2025 . Screenshot of the change. This additional week will allow me to concentrate efforts on reaching three groups that are yet to meet the minimum response target of 80 participants per group . These are: PNG students currently studying in China , and students enrolled in the Chinese Language Programs (CLPs) at the University of Technology (UoT) and the University of Goroka (UoG) . While other participant groups—such as ...

Understanding the Seven Survey Groups: Who Should Participate in My PhD Research?

Image
As part of my PhD research at Divine Word University, I’m examining how China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) are influencing PNG’s bilateral relationship with China. These programs include scholarships, language courses, and public sector training opportunities. To capture the breadth of experiences, I designed my survey to target seven distinct participant groups. This structure ensures I collect nuanced data that reflects the different pathways through which Papua New Guineans engage with China’s educational diplomacy. The first group consists of PNG students currently studying in China . This includes those on Chinese Government Scholarships (CGSP), those sponsored by PNG’s STEM program, those funded by their district or provincial governments, and privately sponsored students. Many of these students have been reached through WeChat groups, LinkedIn, and university contacts. Their experiences are key to understanding China’s appeal and influence on future PNG professio...

Mapping the Landscape: How Literature Informs My Study on China–PNG Higher Education Relations

Image
A well-developed literature review is the foundation of any research project. In my study, which investigates how China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) influence Sino-PNG relations, the literature serves a dual purpose. First, it provides the theoretical grounding—mainly soft power and education diplomacy—to frame the research. Second, it identifies empirical and policy gaps that justify the study. The literature not only supports my main research question but also helps address each of the three supporting questions. This review draws on academic literature and regional case studies spanning diplomatic theory, international education, and PNG’s foreign policy. Photo courtesy of Lake Media, showing me concluding my PhD confirmation seminar and taking notes of audience questions and comments, alongside Professor Maretta Kula-Semos, Professor of Humanities and Director of Higher Degrees.   The first category of literature addresses soft power and educational dipl...

A New Framework for Understanding PNG–China Education Pathways

Image
As part of my PhD research exploring the influence of China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) on PNG–China relations, I have refined the way I categorize participants. Rather than lumping all student pathways into a single group, I now group them into three categories based on their funding source and facilitation method: Chinese government–sponsored, PNG government–sponsored, and privately sponsored programs. This typology offers a more accurate reflection of the student experience and supports a more nuanced analysis of education diplomacy. The first category is Chinese government–sponsored programs , which includes the Chinese Government Scholarship Program (CGSP), Chinese Language Programs (CLPs), and Public Sector Training Programs (PSTPs). These programs are typically administered through the Chinese Embassy and Confucius Institutes, and target university students, public servants, and professionals. The goal is to build long-term people-to-people ties and enhance Chi...

From Broad to Specific: How One Survey Question Evolved to Improve My Research

Image
When I designed the pilot survey for my PhD project in late 2024, one of the most important questions was also one of the simplest: Which Chinese Higher Education Exchange Program have you participated in or are you currently participating in? This was listed as Question 10 in the pilot and served a critical function—it allowed me to identify which program each participant had joined: the Chinese Government Scholarship Program (CGSP), Chinese Language Program (CLP), Public Sector Training Program (PSTP), or “Other.” At the time, it was a broad but essential tool to classify responses because all 30 invited participants received the same link. No group-specific links were used. Question 10 from the pilot survey used broad program categories. Feedback from participants suggested the need for more specific distinctions to reflect the growing diversity of PNG-China education pathways.   While the structure seemed sufficient at first, feedback from the 20 participants who completed th...

Refining the Research: Lessons from My Pilot Survey on China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs

Image
From November 22 to December 22, 2024, I conducted a pilot survey as part of my PhD research on how China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs (HEEPs) influence Sino–PNG relations. The pilot involved 20 participants and was designed to test the structure, clarity, and effectiveness of my survey instrument. It aimed to uncover how programs like the Chinese Government Scholarship Program (CGSP), Chinese Language Programs (CLPs), and Public Sector Training Programs (PSTPs) shape educational diplomacy and soft power in PNG. This preparatory step helped identify ways to refine the methodology before launching the main survey. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling using my personal and professional networks, including contacts on LinkedIn. I invited 30 individuals to participate and 20 responded. Of those, 55% were male and 45% were female . The average completion time was 22.35 minutes. Despite the limited number, their feedback was critical in exposing gaps and ambiguitie...