Peter O'Neill and Climate Change

-
The PNG government through the leadership of Peter O'Neill has advocated vigorously in different forums about the threat posed by climate change. The Prime Minister talked about the issue at the:
The government's view was shared by the alternative government in the passing of the United Nations Paris Agreement (Implementation) Bill in 2016. Below are excerpts of what certain individuals said during the presentation of the bill in parliament: 
Jim Kas the former governor of Madang said: "climate change is affecting us and we as a nation will have to be very serious about what we are doing from the provincial level to the districts in addressing this issue".
Garry Juffa the current governor of Oro said: "My leaders we are the ones that will determine what will happen tomorrow, nobody else. No saviour is going to come from another planet or country and save Papua New Guinea. It is up to you and I and we must make those decisions. We must save our nation and we must be innovative and creative and look at technology and partner with those who have the same interest as us and provide sustainable solutions for our people so that we are not destructive and irresponsible with our environment. At the end of the day, that is the price that we will ultimately pay. Our people will pay."
Francis Awesa the former member for Imbonggu said: "The two previous ones were not implemented fully because some of these big countries like China and USA has disagreements amongst themselves and so we lost many years in between."
PNG is now seen as a poster boy for the climate change issue thanks to the leadership of Peter O'Neill. He believes that climate change is real and it is killing people and destroying communities. This view of  his as shown above is also shared by other parliamentarians regardless of where they are sitting on the floor of parliament.

The recent Boe Declaration is a confirmation of PNG's stance. Climate change presents the single greatest threat to the livelihood, security and wellbeing of Pacific people. The leaders who attend were able to reaffirm the message broadcasted by Peter O'Neill since he became the prime minister of PNG.

The Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato attended the meeting on behalf of the Prime Minister and signed the Boe Declaration.


In the Alotau Accord I, the government of Peter O'Neill committed itself to setting up the necessary policy and legislative platforms for addressing the issue of climate change domestically and internationally. They were able to achieve their plan by formulating the National Climate Compatible Development Management Policy and passing the Climate Change (Management) Act 2015.

Priority 87 of the Alotau Accord II again showed continued support for addressing the climate change issue. The O'Neill led government committed itself to strengthening adaptability to climate change challenges and wants to put more emphasis on disaster preparedness, responses and recovery.

In regards to the disaster issue, Peter O'Neill was able to visit the Manam Islanders at Zogari village to talk to the people and assess the damages caused by the recent volcanic activity. He made a commitment of K3 million to assist those affected by the disaster.

The Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato echoed priority 87 in his meeting with Norway's Minister of International Development.


Therefore, on the topic of climate as a geopolitical factor, PNG under the leadership of Peter O'Neill is a good case study. He was able to advocate the message in various platforms at the domestic, regional and international level. His government has clear plans outlined in the Alotau Accord I and II which is based on the Vision 2050 Strategic Plan, in particular Pillar 5 on Environment Sustainability and Climate Change.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a ...
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di...
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask he...
Read more