China-PNG: Changing perspectives

-
In the past few months, I have read many commentaries on social media by Papua New Guineans about the China-PNG bilateral relations. The commentaries were from people with different levels of knowledge.

Some of the commentaries were misleading and from people who knew less about both countries. There were some who gave insightful commentaries because they knew a lot. Regardless, it was good that many Papua New Guineans have started or are starting to talk about China in a different way.

Prior to 2018, the talk was centered on the cheap or poor quality goods sold in Chinese shops. Many were also concerned about the national invasion of Chinese entrepreneurs. The anti-Chinese riots in different centers around the country was a materialization of the conversation. 

The riots happened in May 2009. After that experience, I left for China to pursue postgraduate studies in September, the same year. While in China, I wrote an essay about China in PNG for my Korean professor. In that essay, I referred to the riots as the 'May mayhem 09'.   

After Peter O'Neill returned from China in June this year (2018) the conversation changed. Many have been optimistic that China will help with our need for better infrastructure. Paias Wingti publicly stated that China could help built super highways to connect the country.



This change in the conversation on social media has helped changed the view people have of China as a country, and the Chinese diaspora in PNG. In many of the Facebook discussion groups, users are discussing about the roads being built by China, and their concern about the debt trap issue. Many have read about what is happening in places like Sri Lanka.

The 'One Belt One Road' policy is not only about building tangible infrastructure. It is also changing the negative perception people have of China to a more positive perception. Now many know that China is a major player and it can compete with the US economically. The US Vice President just confirmed this last week when he gave his address during the APEC Summit.

The US Vice President has cleared the doubts that many Papua New Guineans have of China. He has indirectly told them that China is a juggernaut and we respect them enough to compete with them. In other words, if the US is worried about Chinese influence in the Pacific, then that means that China has the economic capability to assist PNG with our infrastructural needs.


Is China the answer to PNG's prayer for infrastructure development? My quest to find an answer to this question started with a Facebook poll that I created this morning. The purpose of the poll is to find out how many of my friends and family on Facebook think PNG will benefit more in a tangible way from our relationship with China.

The poll will run for 7 days. I hope during this period many will find time to indicate yes/no in order for me to draw my conclusion.

Comments

  1. Clive Martins KApril 1, 2021 at 12:17 PM

    I agree with you Mr. Yegiora. However, regular spread of Sinophobia by countries like Australia and US can cost Papua New Guinea. Therefore, I believe it is time Papua New Guineans be cautious with the type of information we consume.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Rise and fall realism

-
Image
By Colin Elman and Michael A. Jensen Source: Williams, P. D. (Ed.). (2008). Security studies: an introduction . London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. What is rise and fall realism? Rise and fall realism remerge as a powerful alternative to the balance of power theories that predominated international relations scholarship during the 1950’s. Central theme Hegemony is the foundation for peace while balance is often associated with war (Organski). Dynamics Rise and fall realism emphasizes that war between major powers is least likely when the international system is dominated by a single state and when there are no rising challengers vying for system leadership. Given its privileged position, a dominant state is capable of shaping the rules and practices of the international system in such a way as to satisfy its selfish interest. Stability is a product of this hegemonic order, as states which are dissatisfied with the status quo lack the capabilities to change it.
Read more