Unveiling the Hidden Influencers: The Power of Individuals in Shaping Foreign Policy

The individual level of analysis in foreign policy analysis (FPA) plays a crucial role in understanding decision-making processes and policy outcomes. Hudson outlines six hallmarks of FPA, one of which is the multilevel nature of factors that influence decision-making, categorized into individual, state, and system levels.

At the individual level, Goldstein emphasizes the significance of individual human beings as the true actors in international relations. Great leaders, citizens, soldiers, and thinkers shape the course of history through their perceptions, choices, and actions. Understanding the personalities, beliefs, and values of decision-makers provides insights into their motivations and decision-making processes. Personality traits, political inclinations, and values can influence foreign policy decisions, and knowledge of these factors enhances our understanding of decision-makers' motivations.

Perceptions also play a significant role in the individual level of analysis. The way policy-makers make sense of specific decision-making situations influences their foreign policy choices. Students of perception, framing, and problem representation study how decision-makers interpret and define events and situations in their world. Minister Pato's perception of the benefits of hosting refugees and their positive contributions to national development influenced the endorsement of the national refugee policy.

Minister Pato's understanding of Melanesian communalism and his perception that non-Melanesian refugees could contribute similarly to Melanesian refugees shaped his endorsement of the policy. His perception aligned with the belief that providing assistance to those in need, regardless of blood ties or cultural connections, was a fundamental aspect of Melanesian identity. These individual-level factors influenced the decision-making process and subsequent policy outcomes.

In analyzing the individual level of analysis, it is essential to consider public perceptions as well. Public opinion and societal attitudes toward foreign policy decisions can influence their reception and implementation. News clips from EMTV can provide insights into public perceptions regarding the national refugee policy.

Understanding the individual level of analysis is not limited to foreign policy but can also be applied to other fields. For example, studying the teaching and learning strategies employed by academics requires an understanding of the individuals who formulate these strategies. Personal traits, beliefs, values, and perceptions of academics influence their teaching approaches and decisions regarding assessment tasks.

Furthermore, the absence of foreign policy or international relations academia in Papua New Guinea influences the teaching philosophy of the lecturer. Access to technology and online resources has changed the way learning and teaching are conducted, and personal experiences shape the view on knowledge accessibility and sharing.

In conclusion, the individual level of analysis is vital in foreign policy analysis as it focuses on decision-makers and their perceptions, beliefs, values, and personalities. Understanding these factors provides valuable insights into the motivations and decision-making processes of individuals in shaping foreign policy. The individual level of analysis is also applicable in other contexts, such as academia and teaching strategies. By considering the individual level, we can better comprehend the reasons behind foreign policy decisions and their impact on international relations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

Rise and fall realism