China poverty eradication: An example for PNG

-

In the global landscape of developing nations, China has risen as a remarkable beacon of hope for countries eager to tackle the scourge of extreme poverty. The recent data from the World Bank is nothing short of astonishing: more than 850 million people in China have escaped the clutches of extreme poverty over the past four decades. This accomplishment stands as a testament to the potential for other developing nations, like Papua New Guinea (PNG), to achieve similar feats.

The question that naturally arises is, how did China manage to uplift an astounding 10 million people out of extreme poverty each year? How did they successfully remove 832 counties and 128,000 villages from the poverty-stricken list in a mere eight years? The answer to these questions is a modern-day miracle, one masterminded by President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China (CPC).

President Xi Jinping's Vision

President Xi made it clear that the CPC Central Committee has accorded the highest priority to poverty alleviation in their governance. They view this endeavour as the cornerstone of building a moderately prosperous society in all aspects. President Xi's personal commitment was apparent in his over 50 inspection trips to impoverished areas, covering every one of the country's 14 extremely impoverished regional clusters.

A Practical Approach

What sets China's approach apart is its practicality and relevance. This is precisely what PNG needs. The issue of extreme poverty is a universal challenge that transcends political systems. Leaders must venture into rural areas, engage with the residents of villages and wards, and take note of their unique difficulties.

Population Disparity

It's worth noting that China and PNG differ significantly in terms of population size. Despite this, China has been able to meet the basic needs of its citizens, including food, clothing, compulsory education, basic healthcare, and housing security. China has also offered tailored medical treatments to over 20 million impoverished patients and implemented social aid programs covering more than 24 million people, including those facing difficult circumstances and individuals with disabilities.

Local Solutions

A key element of China's success lies in the localization of solutions. The design of their poverty alleviation program involved identifying over 800 of the poorest counties across the nation, representing approximately 30% of China's total land area. Over a million officials were assigned the task of studying and understanding the unique nature of each of these counties. Local officials and leadership in each county were provided with the tools and the freedom to develop tailored poverty alleviation solutions.

Bilateral Relations

PNG can also benefit from fostering cordial bilateral relations with China. Through mutually beneficial cooperation, PNG can facilitate educational opportunities for its citizens to study programs of their choice in China. The knowledge and expertise gained from these programs can then be harnessed to engage in a similar poverty alleviation program at the local government level, specifically at the district and ward levels. These returning individuals can help formulate strategies that are well-suited to PNG's unique context and level of development.

In Conclusion

China's extraordinary success in eradicating extreme poverty stands as a shining example for nations like Papua New Guinea. By putting poverty alleviation at the forefront of governance, adopting practical strategies, and exploring bilateral cooperation, PNG can embark on a path of transformation that will ultimately improve the lives of its citizens and propel the nation toward a brighter future. China has shown us that modern-day miracles are possible, and it's a blueprint that PNG can certainly follow.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a ...
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di...
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask he...
Read more