Decoding Papua New Guinea's Political Jargon: Nek, Sevis, Wantok, and Kin

-

Papua New Guinea, a land of diverse cultures and languages, has a unique political landscape shaped by its rich tapestry of traditions. In this vibrant political arena, where language often weaves intricate stories, several terms stand out – Nek, Sevis, Wantok, and Kin. Let's delve into the heart of these words and unravel their political significance.

Nek - Navigating the Political Landscape

"Nek," derived from the Tok Pisin word for neck, usually refers to the human body part. However, in the realm of Papua New Guinean politics, it takes on a new meaning. Here, "nek" is synonymous with gaining financial benefits or securing jobs to fulfill one's personal interests or needs. It reflects the intricate dance of power and influence, where individuals seek to enhance their positions through strategic alliances and resource allocations.

In the context of Papua New Guinea's political landscape, the term "nek" encapsulates the dynamic nature of political maneuvering, where individuals strive to gain advantages for themselves or their constituents.

Sevis - Building Bridges Through Service

The word "Sevis," originating from the Tok Pisin term for service, plays a crucial role in the political narrative of Papua New Guinea. Unlike the self-serving connotations of "nek," "sevis" emphasizes tangible benefits for the electorate. It refers to infrastructure development and the provision of essential services aimed at improving the lives of the people.

In the political lexicon, "sevis" represents a commitment to the well-being of the community, focusing on initiatives that directly contribute to the betterment of living conditions. It embodies the responsibility of political leaders to serve their constituents by addressing critical needs and fostering sustainable development.

Wantok - Connections Beyond Kinship

The term "Wantok" goes beyond the conventional boundaries of kinship. While it is commonly understood to refer to someone who is not a relative, its political context broadens the scope of connections. In politics, "Wantok" encompasses individuals linked to the community through various ties – be it through residency, long-term friendships, or shared educational experiences.

This nuanced term captures the essence of community bonds that extend beyond blood relations, highlighting the interconnectedness of people in a society where personal connections hold significant weight in political dynamics.

Kin - Blood Ties in Political Networks

In a society where family holds profound importance, the term "Kin" takes center stage in the political narrative. Unlike the broader connections suggested by "Wantok," "Kin" specifically refers to individuals with blood ties and familial bonds. These political allies are not just associates; they are part of the family tree, sharing a deeper connection that often influences political decisions and allegiances.

In Papua New Guinea, where personal relationships carry immense weight, the concept of "Kin" underscores the significance of familial bonds in shaping political affiliations and alliances.

 

Voting at Yabong Field Ward 3 Madang Urban for the Madang Open and Regional seats

Conclusion: The Tapestry of Papua New Guinea's Political Discourse

As we unravel the meanings behind these Tok Pisin terms – Nek, Sevis, Wantok, and Kin – we gain insight into the intricacies of Papua New Guinea's political landscape. Here, language is more than a means of communication; it is a reflection of cultural values, societal connections, and the complex dance of power.

In the diverse and dynamic world of Papua New Guinea's politics, understanding these terms provides a glimpse into the rich tapestry of relationships, services, and personal interests that shape the nation's governance. As the political narrative continues to evolve, these words will remain integral to the ongoing story of Papua New Guinea.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a ...
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di...
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask he...
Read more