Redefining National Security: Why PNG’s NIO Act Needs an Update

-

In a rapidly evolving global and regional security environment, Papua New Guinea faces a range of new challenges that demand a fresh approach to national security. The National Intelligence Organization Act 1984 was crafted in an era when threats were largely limited to espionage, sabotage, and terrorism. While these remain relevant, the definition of national security must evolve to reflect the complexities of today’s world.

Why the Current Definition Is Outdated

The Act defines national security as protecting PNG from threats like espionage, sabotage, and terrorism, as well as fulfilling international obligations. However, it overlooks modern concerns such as cyber threats, environmental degradation, economic vulnerabilities, and transnational crimes like human and drug trafficking. Additionally, PNG’s vast maritime domain, rich with resources, is increasingly exposed to illegal activities such as unregulated fishing and foreign exploitation.

As geopolitical tensions rise, particularly in the Pacific region, PNG must also consider its role in regional stability. The current definition does not account for the need to collaborate with allies or respond to the shifting dynamics of major power rivalries between nations like China and the United States.

What Should Change in the Definition?

To remain relevant, PNG’s definition of national security must:

  1. Incorporate Emerging Threats: Cybersecurity, environmental threats, and economic risks must be included.
  2. Emphasize Maritime Security: Recognize the importance of protecting PNG’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and its resources.
  3. Promote Regional Stability: Address PNG’s responsibilities in fostering peace and security within the Pacific.
  4. Include Human Security: Disaster response, climate change impacts, and community resilience are increasingly vital.

Madang market precinct
 A Proposed New Definition

National security encompasses the protection of PNG's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and people against traditional threats such as espionage, terrorism, and sabotage, as well as modern challenges including cyber threats, maritime security, environmental degradation, economic vulnerabilities, and transnational crimes. It also includes efforts to promote regional stability, fulfill international obligations, and address human security issues critical to the nation's sustainability and resilience.

The Way Forward

By updating the definition of national security, PNG can ensure that its legislative and institutional frameworks are equipped to handle today’s challenges. This redefinition is not just a legal necessity but a strategic imperative to safeguard PNG’s future. It aligns with the National Security Policy’s vision for a whole-of-government approach, ensuring that all sectors work together to protect the nation’s interests in an increasingly interconnected world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask her ou
Read more