Terrorism in Madang?
In our bid to understand terrorism, I shared with you three guiding questions aimed at sparking a debate. We did debate, we listened to you all defending your point of views and counter arguing. The dialectical process of arguing and counter arguing is initiated by critical evaluation of a case or point of view. I hope you will continue to debate in a constructive way. For example, after listening to your peers, some of you counter argued that those who vandalized the water pump station at Panim were not terrorists. You said they did not have the capabilities like Al Qaeda or Boko Haram operatives. You disagreed strongly with the categorization by some of your peers that they were terrorists. The definitions of terrorism shared in the chapter written by Rogers (2008) and the videos we viewed helped provided the framework for analyzing the first question. The first question was aimed at getting you to identify the act. After identifying, the next step was to decide