International system as a common element

-

International is defined by WordWeb as; “concerning or belonging to all or at least two or more nations.” While system is “an organize structure for arranging and classifying or a combination of methods or rules governing behaviour”. When merged together, we can say a combination of rules governing the behavior of states and non-state actors.

In support of this definition, Buzan and Little (2000) stated that states interact within a set of well-defined and long-established “rules of the game” governing what is considered a state and how states treat each other.

Their interpretation of the international system complements Goldstein’s definition. According to Goldstein (2005, p. 10), “the international system is a set of relationships among the world’s states, structured according to certain rules and patterns of interaction.” 

The rules of the game are either implicit or explicit. They determine who is considered a member of the system, what rights and responsibilities the members have and what kind of actions and responses normally occur between states.

The absence of a central authority makes it very hard to enforce rules. States rely on self-help and also the assistance of their allies. Not forgetting the constraining power of international norms.

According to Goldstein (2005) one of the best known norm is sovereignty. Governments have the right in principle to do whatever they want in their own territory. Due to anarchy states are the highest power, they are autonomous and separate. That means all states are equal in principle and therefore it is not right to interfere in the internal affairs of another state.

The international system places high value on respect for internationally recognized borders. Land and sea borders define a nation-state. The case of the South China Sea is an ongoing issue that might lead to a possible war between Vietnam, Japan, the Philippines and China. China claims that it owns the group of islands with enormous amounts of oil. Their claim is disputed by the other countries in the region causing tension.

States develop norms of diplomacy to facilitate their interaction. These norms have become international law in the form of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The Vienna Convention (Article 22.3) stipulates that; “the premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition or execution.” Diplomatic immunity enjoyed by diplomats is an intricate part of the system.

I like this statement by Goldstein (2005, p.77); “in the anarchy of the international system, the most reliable brake on the power of one state is the power of other states”. During the Cold War, America’s power was balanced by the power of the USSR. Either acting singly or in an alliance the act of counter balancing occurs regularly and maintains the stability of the international system.

According to Goldstein (2005, p. 81); “with each state’s power balanced by other states, the most important characteristic of an international system in the view of many realist is the distribution of power among states in an international system.” We have different power distribution patterns from a unipolar system to a bipolar or a tri polar and a multi polar system. All these systems shape what happens in international politics.

Our attempt to understand foreign policy went beyond looking at foreign policy at face value. We compared and contrasted various definitions of foreign policy. From this comparative analysis we isolated elements we saw as being common. These common elements (state actors, non-state actors, national interest and international system) were then analyzed one by one to justify why we think they are common elements.

Foreign policy

We defined international system as per the context of our discussion to be a combination of rules governing the behavior of states and non-state actors. In addition, we categorized it as a common element because the international system is made up of rules and norms that define the interaction of state and non-state actors.

Reference

WordWeb Software. (2006). WordWeb 7. USA: Princeton University.

Buzan, B. & Little, R. (2000). International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldstein, J. (2005). International relations (6th ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press. 

McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask her ou
Read more