Understanding foreign policy analysis

-

In IR204, we began the unit by defining foreign policy and identifying the common elements in the definition of foreign policy. One common element is the state; the state is just an abstract made concrete by the presence of human beings.


Throughout history we have read about the many heroes or heroines who changed the course of their civilization. Almost all of them were and are human beings and not reptiles or amphibians. Thus, human beings are like fuel in a car that makes the car move or like flour in a cake.


This understanding is the starting point for our discussion on foreign policy analysis. According to Hudson (2007, p. 4), foreign policy analysis is the study of human decision makers acting singly or in groups.

FPA (2)


Acting singly in a position of authority and power a human being like the President of the United States of America has the capability to make a decision that will change the world. To understand the factors that influence a single decision maker one must refer to the individual level of analysis. At the individual level, there are two approaches to decision making; the rational and the cognitive psychology approach.


Rational involves reasoning in the form of a cost and benefit analysis, while cognitive psychology involves the use of cognitive, emotional, psychological and biological factors including perceptions. The poliheuristic approach is when a decision maker uses both approaches together to make a decision.


As much as we want to be rational, sometimes because we are not robots, we do take the cognitive psychology approach in decision making. That means, we make decisions based on our human emotions, gender and perceptions.


Wikipedia states that foreign policy analysis involves the study of how a state makes foreign policy by analyzing the decision making process. From conceptualization to implementation the decision making process is very cumbersome. Furthermore, Wikipedia states that foreign policy analysis can be considered a sub-field of the study of international relations, which aims to understand the processes behind foreign policy decision making.


According to the foreign policy analysis website;

“As a field of study foreign policy analysis is characterized by its actor-specific focus. In its simplest terms, it is the study of the process, effects, causes, or outputs of foreign policy decision-making in either a comparative or case-specific manner. The underlying and often implicit argument theorizes that human beings, acting as a group or within a group, compose and cause change in international politics”.

In a comparative manner means to compare different cases, while a case-specific manner means analyzing a particular case to help one understand the process, effects, causes, or outputs of foreign policy decision-making.


If you compare the various ways in which different scholars and websites define foreign policy analysis, the common elements are human beings and decision making. It is human beings who make decisions. Decision making is a process that involves human beings acting singly or in groups to satisfy both personal and national interest.


Maybe from reading the different definitions of foreign policy analysis you have your own take on the question ‘what is foreign policy analysis?’ If you have a simple definition, please share with the rest of us on the Moodle discussion forum. Like I always say; ‘no one has monopoly over knowledge’.


I like the definition of foreign policy as; a line of argument rationalizing the course of action a government takes, when interacting with other states and non-state actors in the international system.


‘Course of action a government takes’ means a decision. It is common knowledge that only human beings make decisions either acting alone or in a group. Thus, this is how the definition of foreign policy is related to the sub-field of foreign policy analysis.


In other words, foreign policy analysis is like a magnifying glass that we will use to look deep into the definition of foreign policy to see how, why and what course of action is taken by whom at what time.


Foreign policy analysis is the study of human decision makers acting singly or in groups to make decisions that have international and national significance. Like all other social sciences, human beings and the decisions we make is the fundamental element of international relations. I believe Hudson (2007) calls it the ground of international relations.


It will be a great challenge to document the foreign policy process in PNG. We will have to find out how culture influence decision makers. Apart from culture, what other unique features influence decision makers. This will help us confirm some of the theories of international relations or foreign policy analysis.


Reference

Hudson, V. (2007). Foreign policy analysis classic and contemporary theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Wikipedia. (n. d.). Foreign policy analysis. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://www.en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_analysis

Foreign policy analysis. (n. d.) Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://www.foreignpolicyanalysis.org/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a ...
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di...
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask he...
Read more