Unveiling the Interconnectedness of Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations

-

In this enlightening blog post, we're about to embark on a journey to uncover the three integral features that bind Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) with the vast realm of International Relations (IR). Our exploration, though limited in scope, will shed light on the interplay between these two crucial fields, inviting you to delve deeper into their intricate connection.

Feature 1: Categorization

Let's begin our expedition with the first binding feature: categorization. IR, as meticulously defined by Encyclopedia Britannica, is a subfield of political science. The overarching umbrella of political science encompasses the systematic study of governance through empirical and scientific methods. It delves into the mechanisms of the state, its organs, and the institutions that shape its functioning.

Delving further, Encyclopedia Britannica elucidates that IR revolve around the intricate tapestry of political relationships and interactions between countries. This encompasses understanding the triggers behind conflicts, the formulation of foreign policies, the dynamics of international political economy, and the structures that expand or constrict governments' policy choices.

As we navigate deeper, we come across the intriguing categorization of FPA within the realm of IR. According to Marijke Breuning, FPA stands as a specialized niche within the broader landscape of IR. FPA homes in on the nuanced examination of how foreign policy decisions are crafted, why leaders make specific choices, and the underlying factors that shape state behaviors. This aligns seamlessly with the goal of IR: to comprehend the motivations driving leaders and states and to assess the impact of the international system's opportunities and constraints.

Encyclopedia Britannica underscores the two principal perspectives within IR: the foreign-policy perspective and the international-system-analysis perspective. The former revolves around theories centered on individual states or specific state categories, while the latter examines broader international system dynamics. This juxtaposition unravels a crucial facet of the connection between FPA and IR.

Feature 2: Behaviourism's Emergence

Our exploration takes us to the emergence of behaviourism, a pivotal development in the domains of political science and international relations. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, classical behaviourism is rooted in observable and measurable data, eschewing the realms of emotions, ideas, and inner mental experiences.

Before the advent of behaviourism, international relations research primarily encompassed diplomatic history and international law. These domains focused on the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy. However, the quest to understand the underlying causes of conflict propelled researchers from various fields, including social sciences and mathematics, to pioneer a new research method: behaviourism.

Behaviourism ushered in quantitative methods alongside qualitative ones. Philip Schrodt highlights that behavioural studies in foreign policy aimed to systematically measure variables, employ statistical techniques, and formulate unequivocal hypotheses. The shift from narrative sources to the systematic analysis of events data transformed the research landscape, offering new tools to analyze interactions between states.

Feature 3: The Ground of IR

As we tread deeper into the connection between FPA and IR, we encounter the notion of the "ground." Valerie Hudson introduces the concept that every theoretical discipline has its grounding element. For economists, it's firms or households; for physics, it's matter and antimatter particles.

Hudson challenges the prevalent assumption that the ground of IR is state and non-state actors. She argues that human beings are the true agents shaping IR. Human perception, reactions, and interactions with the world are pivotal to understanding the dynamics of IR. In her words, "Understanding how humans perceive and react to the world around them, and how humans shape and are shaped by the world around them, is central to the inquiry of social scientists, even those in IR."

This ties in seamlessly with the distinctions between classical realism and neorealism. While classical realism centers on leaders' motivations and lust for power, neorealism disregards these internal variables, emphasizing competition among states or adherence to norms as driving factors.

In a similar vein, neoclassical realism emphasizes that domestic structures and agents like political leaders influence state behavior. This emphasizes the significance of understanding the human decision-makers who influence state and non-state actors.

Unveiling the Connection: A Multifaceted Tapestry

As we reach the culmination of our exploration, it becomes evident that the connection between FPA and IR is a multifaceted tapestry, interwoven by three key features:

  1. Categorization: FPA is not just a subfield but an integral part of IR, aiding in understanding state behavior and policy decisions.
  2. Behaviourism's Influence: The shift towards quantitative methods influenced both IR and FPA research, offering a fresh perspective on understanding international dynamics.
  3. The Human Ground of IR: Human agents, their perceptions, and actions serve as the essential ground for understanding the behavior of state and non-state actors.

In conclusion, our journey through these features reveals the symbiotic relationship between FPA and IR. It is essential to grasp this connection to enhance our comprehension of both fields. So, read widely, explore further, and continue unraveling the intricate fabric that binds these two vital domains together.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Rise and fall realism

-
Image
By Colin Elman and Michael A. Jensen Source: Williams, P. D. (Ed.). (2008). Security studies: an introduction . London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. What is rise and fall realism? Rise and fall realism remerge as a powerful alternative to the balance of power theories that predominated international relations scholarship during the 1950’s. Central theme Hegemony is the foundation for peace while balance is often associated with war (Organski). Dynamics Rise and fall realism emphasizes that war between major powers is least likely when the international system is dominated by a single state and when there are no rising challengers vying for system leadership. Given its privileged position, a dominant state is capable of shaping the rules and practices of the international system in such a way as to satisfy its selfish interest. Stability is a product of this hegemonic order, as states which are dissatisfied with the status quo lack the capabilities to change it.
Read more