Comparing Biketawa and Boe Declarations: Continuity and Change in Pacific Security

-

The Biketawa Declaration, signed by member states of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) in 2000, was a regional security agreement aimed at addressing security issues collectively in the Pacific region. Its predecessor, the Boe Declaration, was signed in 2018 and similarly emphasized the importance of regional security. Both agreements marked a shift in thinking about security.

In this review, we will compare the Biketawa Declaration and the Boe Declaration, examining elements of continuity and change. We will discuss the use of the principle of non-intervention, the protection of human rights, and regional cooperation as key elements of continuity. Both agreements stress the respect for the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of member states. However, there have been instances, such as the regional assistance mission to the Solomon Islands, where member states intervened in the domestic affairs of another member state, raising questions about the practical application of this principle.

The protection of human rights is another area of continuity in both agreements. The Biketawa Declaration emphasizes the importance of individual liberty under the law, while the Boe Declaration addresses the issue of human rights in the context of non-traditional security. However, more concrete cooperation is needed among member states to effectively address human rights abuses, such as the sorcery accusation-related violence in Papua New Guinea.

While continuity is observed in certain aspects, there are elements of change as well. One significant change is the shift in focus from traditional security issues to non-traditional security issues. The Boe Declaration, particularly in its first declaration, highlights concerns about climate change and rising sea levels. This shift reflects the growing recognition of the impact of non-traditional security issues on the region. The Boe Declaration's strategic focus areas are all categorized as non-traditional security issues.

Another notable change is the reduced emphasis on good governance and the rule of law in the Boe Declaration. Unlike the Biketawa Declaration, which includes a course of action on this topic, the Boe Declaration prioritizes non-traditional security issues and does not explicitly address democratic processes and institutions. This change may be influenced by the experiences with Fiji, where the suspension from the PIF was based on issues related to good governance.

Transnational crime is highlighted as a significant non-traditional security issue in the Boe Declaration. Member states recognize the challenges posed by drug smuggling and cybercrime, acknowledging the limited capacity of small island states to effectively combat these crimes. The discovery of a major cocaine bust in Papua New Guinea and the existence of a clandestine meth lab highlight the need for collective efforts to address transnational crime in the region.

In conclusion, the elements of continuity in the Biketawa Declaration and the Boe Declaration include the principle of non-interference, the protection of human rights, and regional cooperation. However, there are also elements of change, such as the shift in focus towards non-traditional security issues and the reduced emphasis on good governance and the rule of law. The Boe Declaration provides a framework for addressing contemporary security challenges if effectively implemented, but member states must align their national security policies accordingly.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FPA: Organizational Process Model

-
This model centers on the fact that different bureaucracies have different standard operating procedures. These procedures are made in order to allow day to day operations to be carried out. Thus, a foreign policy decision is made based on these standard operating procedures. It is hard for a bureaucracy to make a decision or let alone function out of character or contrary to their standard operating procedure. The reading Chapter 4: Foreign policy shares a straight forward explanation of the OPM: "An alternative to the rational model of decision making is the organizational process model. In this model, foreign policy decision makers generally skip the labor-intensive process of identifying goals and alternative actions, relying instead for most decisions on standardized responses or standard operating procedures. For example, the U.S. State Department everyday receives more than a thousand reports or inquiries from its embassies around the world and sends out more than a
Read more

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

-
Image
Liberal internationalism is defined by Griffiths, O'Callaghan and Roach (2008, p.190) as a project to transform international relations so that they conform to models of peace, freedom, and prosperity allegedly enjoyed within constitutional liberal democracies. The same scholars go further by dividing liberalism into three distinct groups. They say these are the three ways to implement the project. The way they present liberal internationalism as a project makes their work interesting. Three distinct groups Firstly, commercial liberalism is about free trade between states. States bilaterally or multilaterally via a platform like APEC pursue the goal of trade liberalization. Griffiths, O'Callagahan and Roach (ibid.) argued that economic interdependence would decrease the likelihood of going to war. Republican liberalism is about democratic peace. The scholars argued that the spread of democracy among states so that governments will be accountable to their citizens makes it di
Read more

Allison's rational actor model

-
There are 3 common models of foreign policy decision making according to Graham Allison: rational actor model organizational process mode government politics model.  We will discuss the 3 models and compare them with the 3 levels of analysis. However, I challenge you to use your own initiative to learn about the other models of decision making. This will help you as future decision makers or analysts to understand how decisions are made and the processes. When one wakes up from bed he or she decides whether or not to brush their teeth, comb their hair and have a shower. These decisions are paramount, they affect and influence how the individual interacts in a social setting. This highlights the fact that as human beings we make decisions every day. Decision making is defined as the thought process of selecting a logical choice from the available options. In the case of the ‘Kibung peles boy’ analogy; the male student had a choice of approaching the girl to ask her ou
Read more