Update on Research Progress: Two Reports Completed

Over the past few weeks, I have been steadily advancing my PhD research on China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs and their influence on Sino–PNG relations. I am pleased to share with you, my survey participants and wider audience, that I have completed two significant research reports. These documents represent important milestones in both the data analysis phase and in refining the methodology that underpins this study.

The first report focuses on the quantitative data analysis. Drawing on the survey responses I received from participants across PNG and those currently studying in China, I examined trends using descriptive statistics such as means, frequencies, and cross-tabulations. These figures reveal not only how students and alumni perceive Chinese scholarships and language programs but also how these experiences are shaping their views on bilateral relations. The data points to consistent support for the academic quality of these programs while also highlighting areas where participants felt improvements could be made.

Quantitative analysis report (13 Aug 2025) on China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs and their influence on PNG, comparing five participant groups.

Beyond surface-level statistics, the quantitative analysis also mapped responses against demographic variables. This made it possible to identify differences between alumni and current students, between male and female respondents, and across different program types such as scholarships, language courses, and public sector training. The findings give me a clearer picture of how diverse groups within PNG society engage with China’s education offerings.

The second report explores the use of LinkedIn as a digital fieldwork method. This platform has been central in enabling me to connect with PNG students and alumni who are scattered across China and other parts of the world. Through LinkedIn, I was able to build a large contact base, share my survey link directly, and engage in conversations with potential participants. This method reduced the barriers of distance, time, and cost, and allowed me to reach individuals who might otherwise have been difficult to locate.

One of the advantages of the LinkedIn method is that it provided a professional and transparent environment for research outreach. Many participants were able to verify my academic background and institutional affiliation before deciding to engage with the study. This trust-building process was essential in encouraging voluntary participation and ensuring the credibility of the research process.

At the same time, the report reflects on the challenges of relying on digital platforms. Not all potential participants are active on LinkedIn, and internet access in PNG remains inconsistent. Nevertheless, by supplementing LinkedIn with other recruitment methods such as WeChat groups and direct outreach, I have been able to achieve a strong participation rate.

Together, these two reports—the quantitative data analysis and the LinkedIn method report—provide both empirical findings and methodological reflection. They strengthen the foundation of my research and demonstrate that the project is progressing steadily toward its broader aim: understanding how China’s Higher Education Exchange Programs influence PNG’s foreign policy environment and bilateral relationship with China.

I want to thank all participants who have contributed so far. Your willingness to share your experiences and perspectives is what makes this research possible. As I move forward into the qualitative phase, I will continue to keep you updated and ensure that your voices are represented in the analysis of one of the most important relationships shaping PNG’s future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Commercial liberalism and the six norms

FPA: Organizational Process Model

Allison's rational actor model